This is the report we generate for any Davidson County address. It is four pages, delivered as a PDF by email within twenty-four hours of order. Below is a section-by-section walkthrough using a representative Forest Hills address. The structure is identical regardless of where the address falls — the contents are not.


§ I · The cover page

Page one of every report establishes four things at a glance: the address itself, an overall environmental score from zero to one hundred, the rating band that score falls into, and a one-paragraph editorial summary that explains the result in plain language. The score is the first thing readers see, and it is meant to be defensible at a glance — an executive summary of a four-page document.

parcelscope Report ID: PS-2026-05-111 · Environmental Records Report
Subject Address · Davidson County
624 Tyne Boulevard
Nashville, TN 37215

Address verified by Census Bureau geocoder. OpenStreetMap parcel-level cross-check confirmed.

This address ranks in our highest band for environmental records — no notable findings within one mile.
EXCELLENT
87
out of 100
This address sits in a low-record-density profile with no active environmental flags within one mile. One Underground Storage Tank (UST) facility within one mile (closed/inactive, no release on file). One golf course within one mile (Richland Country Club, 0.80 mi NW). Tree canopy at 65% in the surrounding 12-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC-12) watershed, well above the U.S. urban average. No findings worth flagging in any other scored category.
What this means for you
  • Environmentally clean compared to most addresses we score
  • One golf-course finding noted — see Score Components for context
  • No immediate action required — informational findings only

The score is one number, but it is calculated against thirteen separately weighted categories. The narrative paragraph immediately summarizes the categories that registered findings — every report leads with what is actually in the public record at that address, before any further detail.


§ II · Score Components

Page two breaks the overall score into its thirteen scored categories. Each category receives its own zero-to-one-hundred score, its own rating, and a one-line note explaining what was found. This is where readers can see, line by line, what the engine actually weighed.

Category Score Rating Notes
Petroleum / Underground Storage Tanks 75 GOOD Forest Hills Shell · 0.92 mi SE · CLOSED, no LUST release on file.
Hazardous Substance / Remediation Sites 100 EXCELLENT No active Superfund sites within 1 mile. No state remediation sites.
Dry Cleaner / Solvent Sites (DCERP) 100 EXCELLENT No DCERP-registered drycleaners within 1 mile.
TRI Facilities (Toxic Release Inventory) 100 EXCELLENT No TRI-reporting facilities within 1 mile.
Golf Course Proximity (Pesticide Drift) 60 MODERATE Richland Country Club · 0.80 mi NW · within 1 mi · upwind on prevailing SW.
Major Road Proximity (PM2.5) 85 GOOD Closest primary/secondary: Hillsboro Pike at 0.42 mi E.
Tree Canopy Coverage 95 EXCELLENT 65% canopy in surrounding HUC-12 watershed. Well above U.S. urban average.
…and six additional categories: Radon, Aviation Noise, Rail Corridors, Landfills, High-Voltage Transmission, Major Event Venues.

A single moderate finding does not lower the overall score dramatically — the scoring engine is calibrated so that a clean profile with one notable flag still reads as Excellent overall. Readers see exactly which category drove the deduction and can decide for themselves whether the finding is material to them.


§ III · Records Found Within One Mile

Page three is the bibliography of the report — every facility, site, or feature actually identified within scoring range, with distance, direction, status, and source agency for each one. If the report says a UST is at 0.92 miles southeast and listed as closed, the row identifier and source agency are right there for the reader to verify directly.

Records Found Within 1 Mile
1
Forest Hills Shell
UST — Closed/Inactive · 0.92 mi SE · TDEC UST + EPA UST Finder
CLOSED
2
Richland Country Club
Private golf course · 0.80 mi NW · within 1 mi · OpenStreetMap
FLAGGED

Two findings, fully sourced. Forest Hills Shell shows up because TDEC's UST registry includes every registered tank — closed, active, or otherwise — and we surface them all. The "closed" status matters: a closed and remediated tank a mile away is meaningfully different from an active facility with a release on file.


§ IV · Wind & Exposure Context

Distance alone is incomplete. A facility 0.4 miles upwind is not the same exposure as a facility 0.4 miles downwind, and a Parcelscope report says so directly. Every report includes a Wind & Exposure block that names the prevailing wind direction at the nearest NOAA station and applies it to each finding.

Prevailing Wind Direction
SW (205°)

Based on 2014–2023 hourly observations from NOAA BNA station (Nashville International Airport). On prevailing SW winds, facilities to the NE are generally downwind of this address; facilities to the SW are upwind. Groundwater pathways operate independently of wind direction.

Richland Country Club — 0.80 mi NW
generally upwind

On prevailing SW winds, the country club is upwind of this address — the relevant context for airborne pesticide-drift exposure cited in the 2025 JAMA Network Open study (Krzyzanowski et al.).

This block is one of the things that distinguishes Parcelscope from a generic environmental records search. Anyone can list a country club at a quarter mile. Saying it sits upwind of you, on the prevailing southwest wind, is the kind of context that changes how a reader interprets the same distance.


§ V · Score Context & Data Sources

The final page closes with the rating-band scale (so readers can place this score against the broader population) and a complete list of the data sources behind the report. Every public agency we read from is named — federal, state, and local — alongside a clear disclaimer about what a Parcelscope report is and is not.

Score Bands
EXCELLENT 85–100 No significant environmental records identified.
GOOD 70–84 Minor findings, all in compliance or closed.
MODERATE 55–69 Notable findings requiring review.
ELEVATED 40–54 Significant findings — recommend professional consultation.
HIGH RISK 0–39 Multiple or severe findings — Phase I ESA strongly recommended.

The data sources are listed by jurisdiction — federal (EPA, FAA, NOAA, U.S. Census), state (TDEC programs), local (Metro Nashville Public Works and Parks), and OpenStreetMap. Every report we generate, for every address, draws from the same set. There is no premium tier, no withheld data — we publish the full source list with each report.


§ VI · What is not in this report

It is worth being explicit about what a Parcelscope report does not attempt to do. It is not a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment under ASTM E1527 — that is a regulated process performed by a licensed environmental professional and costs an order of magnitude more. It is not legal, real estate, or medical advice. It is not a guarantee that no contamination exists at the property; public databases reflect what has been reported, not what is necessarily there.

What it is: a comprehensive read of the public environmental record for one address, rendered in plain language, with every finding cited to its source agency. For most homebuyers, that is the layer that has been missing from due diligence — and the reason Parcelscope exists.